Primary

Policy oscillation creates serious problems that may require government scrutiny.

Supreme Court approval of patent adjudication raises new questions about limits of modern agency adjudication.

Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.

Retrospective regulatory review should concentrate not only on reducing costs but also on creating benefits, like improving societal well-being.

The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.

Regulators need a new system for responding to evolving market forces.

Deregulatory executive orders require a new approach to analyzing regulatory impact.

Recent executive orders undermine the longstanding belief in benefit-cost analysis.

The Trump Administration’s regulatory budget constraint may help improve agency benefit-cost analyses.

The Supreme Court will decide if Ohio can automatically remove inactive voters from its registry.

Despite speculation about his intent to fire the special counsel, President Trump is not above the law.

Firing Mueller would be extreme, but the next step would be even more perilous for the President.