As global temperatures rise, Americans will continue to pay the economic costs of climate change.
Barton and Bibas argue for significant changes to improve justice in the legal system.
Judge Kavanaugh’s views on Chevron may create more uncertainty than exists under the current doctrine.
The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Retrospective regulatory review should concentrate not only on reducing costs but also on creating benefits, like improving societal well-being.
Despite speculation about his intent to fire the special counsel, President Trump is not above the law.
ACUS recommends agencies take steps to study the impacts of their rules.
State and local governments must consider the potential legal risks of their climate change policies.
Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.
Claims that the Trump Administration has radically reduced regulation are simply not true.
Recent legislative process that led to tax changes fell short in terms of key principles of democracy.
Governments need to consider the limitations of performance standards when choosing regulatory strategies.