The Court’s decision will weigh states’ regulatory powers against concerns of economic protectionism.
Scholar points to potential challenges facing congressional investigations into the executive branch.
Court’s ruling could determine the procedure for changing hospital reimbursement formulas.
Experts argue that gaps in federal food safety rules require state governments to step up.
Scholar argues that despite progressive roots, U.S. transparency laws have taken an anti-government focus.
Scholar argues that financial regulators must be decisive yet agile when using imperfect information.
Recent state supreme court decision reaffirms and expands a constitutional duty to preserve natural resources.
Comparative study suggests deregulatory policy is stronger as a political symbol than an economic stimulus.