Scholars consider methods to regulate the practice of setting individualized prices based on personal data.
Uncertainties in value per statistical life estimates impact the extent to which COVID-19 policies yield net benefits.
The Supreme Court relied on misleading arguments and revisionist history to strike down the CFPB’s structure.
Empirical study of the ACA’s implementation provides insight into the delegation of policymaking authority.
A concurring opinion leaves the standard for determining the constitutionality of abortion restrictions in doubt.
The normative foundations of the value of statistical life render it an insufficient tool to analyze pandemic-related policies.
The Supreme Court rules that the Forest Service can approve natural gas pipelines crossing the Appalachian Trail.
The Supreme Court reaffirms lower courts’ ability to claw-back profits from violators of securities laws.
A recent U.S. Copyright Office report reviews a key provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Scholar recommends consumer protection laws to combat misuse of data in the sharing economy.
Requiring government institutions to engage in reasoned decision-making mitigates actions made in bad faith.
Scholar argues for regulatory reforms grounded in an intense focus on net benefits.