The Trump Administration’s new social cost of carbon policy muddies the waters.
Both President Trump and environmental advocates overstate the effects of repealing the Clean Power Plan.
The Regulatory Review’s editor-in-chief reflects on the publication’s past year of coverage, against the backdrop of a fast-changing regulatory world.
This publication’s new name and newly designed website constitute a significant step forward, in furtherance of its mission of public service.
The Trump Administration’s embrace of a seldom-used law may undermine future regulatory efforts.
Bill aimed at regulatory reform would reintroduce burdensome administrative requirements.
Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation hearings offer a key opportunity to examine a judge’s philosophy on the judiciary’s proper role under the Constitution.
Balancing the discretion afforded to multinational and domestic authorities presents special challenges to judges in ensuring effective application of European Union environmental law.
Agency sees increased effectiveness after incorporating feedback from courts and academics.
A regulation that provides a benefit in excess of a cost while helping the disadvantaged subsets of society should be seen as doubly wise.
Scholar argues that governments should embrace vaping’s smoking-cessation potential.
Scholar examines the ways in which bank culture contributed to the financial crisis—and their implications for the Trump Administration.