Opinion

Regulations are the product of negotiations and agreements.

The federal government is moving backwards in its regulatory analysis and decision-making.

The Trump Administration is underweighting the value of human health in benefit-cost analysis.

EPA’s new rule fails to reform the agency’s methods for calculating benefits when regulating particulate matter.

Congress’s expanded use of its oversight mechanism threatens the stability of agency action.

Effective antitrust enforcement in the electricity sector can promote competition and protect consumers’ interests.

A recent case concerning the National Guard may signal growing Supreme Court skepticism of President Trump’s appeals.

The Roberts Court should follow its own reasoned decision-making requirements to constrain regulatory demolition.

The Supreme Court should reconsider the doctrine requiring courts to take a hard look at agency policy changes.

Courts must distinguish substantive from procedural duties in agency review to preserve reasoned decision-making.

The Supreme Court should continue to apply a strong version of the duty to engage in reasoned decision-making

OSHA’s outdated standards endanger American workers by failing to limit ethylene oxide exposure.