Appearing before agencies affords the public an important opportunity to have a genuine impact on the law.
Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.
PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.
Legal scholar argues for greater reliance on entrepreneurial strategies in regulation.
Scholars argue changing global attitudes and U.S. legal culture have impacted white-collar prosecutions.
Scholar argues that society is best off when regulators punish violations after the fact.
Administrative agencies should not be required to use a process that has been obsolete for decades.
Scholar argues that regulators should try to impose penalties before rule violations can hurt society.
Basic principles of American government limit the political role of administrative agencies in legislative debates.
Independent agencies should mirror executive branch practices to overcome judicial scrutiny.
Supreme Court limits agency’s ability to demand repayment of illegal gains.
Supreme Court holds that states cannot adopt rules disfavoring arbitration agreements.