Legal scholars and practitioners analyze the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.
Policy experts consider the constitutionality of a cornerstone of the President’s regulatory reform efforts.
Consumer safety leaders debate how independent agencies can best improve the rulemaking process.
Scholars debate the merits and drawbacks of the recently proposed Regulatory Accountability Act, which would dramatically reform the rulemaking process.
Scholars, activists, and other criminal justice experts address possible legal responses to excessive police force.
Despite the breadth of the Department of Educations’s debt-cancellation powers, it has failed to employ its powers to their fullest extent.
The Regulatory Review celebrates the year 2016’s developments in regulatory news, analysis, and opinion.
No rubric exists to decide how to navigate the use of automation in the administrative state, but society can make informed choices.
Previously published RegBlog essay sparks debate over the role that cost-benefit analysis should play in regulatory decision-making.
Legal scholars present new ways to teach students regulatory law against the backdrop of an expanding regulatory state.
RegBlog unveils its special election feature, starting with daily, on-site reporting on the Democratic National Convention.
The Regulatory Review highlights the regulatory decisions from the Supreme Court’s past term.