Process

Guidance explains when Israeli regulators may adopt external rules into domestic law.

Republicans are using the Government Accountability Office to expand the reach of the Congressional Review Act.

The next logical step to limit the administrative state is shown by recent Supreme Court concurrences.

DHS’s new rule shifts affirmative asylum claims into an overloaded, adversarial court system.

Louis Capozzi examines how state-level officials challenge and defend federal regulations.

Scholar argues that the U.S. Supreme Court is using interim orders to maximize its own authority.

Governments cannot ignore the indirect effects of regulations to reap their full benefits.

Cary Coglianese discusses how regulators can improve their performance in the face of pressing challenges.

The Supreme Court upholds a high-stakes adjudication system, but important constitutional questions remain.

Slaughter and Cook rely on historical inaccuracies while raising new questions about agency independence.

The Supreme Court previews the constitutional clash over who controls federal spending.

Urias-Orellana narrows asylum review, raising the stakes for judicial oversight.