Process

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s tariffs, but it left the big issue of abusive presidential power unaddressed.

Trump v. Slaughter may force independent agencies to provide more rigorous justifications for new rules.

Scholars examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

A proactive framework for analyzing regulations can help municipalities regulate without Chevron deference.

Training records document compliance, but they may not reflect how organizations perform in practice.

Leslie Lewis Johnson discusses public engagement in Pennsylvania’s regulatory review process.

Scholars consider the potential impacts of visa reforms on labor markets and innovation.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to consider governmental interests could lead to a sweeping rollback of regulations.

Federal Agencies’ growing use of AI raises questions about how judges can adequately review those agencies’ decisions.

Scholar assesses the Supreme Court’s differential treatment of administrative law and securities law.

ACUS recommends steps to promote fairness and consistency within the adjudication offices of federal agencies.

ACUS recommends best practices for improving private citizens’ access to government records.