The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.
Panel focuses on claims of potential dangers from growth in government agencies.
No rubric exists to decide how to navigate the use of automation in the administrative state, but society can make informed choices.
Scholars, activists, and other criminal justice experts address possible legal responses to excessive police force.
PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.
Scholar examines what a world of regulation by robot might look like—an innovation that could be just around the corner.
Legal scholars and practitioners analyze the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.
Consumer safety leaders debate how independent agencies can best improve the rulemaking process.
Rather than raising alarm bells, government uses of artificial intelligence fit well within existing legal frameworks.
President Trump’s transgender ban for the military is misguided and potentially illegal.