Proposed limits to EPA’s consideration of scientific data threaten timely, sound policymaking.
Despite concerns, environmental agency’s “transparent science” proposed rule supports existing guidelines.
Scholars and regulatory commentators debate the significance of EPA’s recently proposed “transparency” rule.
Arkansas and EPA take different approaches to regulating a controversial herbicide called dicamba.
Ninth Circuit orders EPA to propose a new standard for lead dust and an updated definition for lead paint.
Despite its popularity, “evidence-based” policymaking is often less rational than it sounds.
Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.
States and subnationals can rise to the challenges posed by climate change.
Study shows that carbon-trading programs may produce less revenue in concentrated markets.
Legal scholar argues for greater reliance on entrepreneurial strategies in regulation.
EPA provides advice instead of regulation in the new nanny state.
Researchers argue for new regulatory treatment of wildfires to improve air quality and public health.