Environmental Protection Agency

EPA’s recent rollback of a climate rule echoes decades of fluctuation in domestic environmental policy.

EPA’s lopsided focus on regulatory costs ignores the much larger forgone benefits and the law.

The EPA dog may catch the climate change bus, but it probably will not end climate change regulation.

Lisa Heinzerling discusses recent developments in environmental law and regulation.

Richard Lazarus discusses the implications of a shift in the Supreme Court’s attitude toward environmental regulations.

Scholars and practitioners assess the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of its recently concluded term.

Rejecting federal agencies’ interpretation of the Clean Water Act, the Supreme Court limits the application of federal law over wetlands.

Experts discuss challenges in regulating PFAS chemicals and suggest opportunities for finding solutions.

Rejecting EPA’s ability to reshape the coal industry, the Court forecasts invalidating future agency actions.  

The Supreme Court casts a shadow across the regulatory state in opinion limiting EPA’s ability to fight climate change.

In a recent case, the Supreme Court failed to address the purpose of exemptions from EPA’s renewable fuel standard.

Scholar advocates using the Administrative Procedure Act to address EPA’s inter-regulatory contradictions.