The President’s one-in, two-out executive order may be difficult to implement, but it is not unconstitutional.
Political science models may help explain the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.
Scholars recommend incorporating health-based standards into federal drinking water regulations.
President Trump’s “one-in, two-out” mandate is irrational and violates the Constitution.
Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.
Both President Trump and environmental advocates overstate the effects of repealing the Clean Power Plan.
Bill aimed at regulatory reform would reintroduce burdensome administrative requirements.
Scholars argue EPA may already have the tools it needs to effectively regulate greenhouse gases.
Recent PPR seminar examines effects on air quality and fuel prices from waiving environmental regulations.
Scholar espouses a renewed focus on pollution prevention efforts, with an appreciation of government’s ability to effect meaningful reform.
What is the cost of emitting soot into the atmosphere? The answer is unclear, yet it plays an important role in policymaking.
New standards for heavy-duty trucks are expected to reduce emissions and allow the industry to keep on truckin’.