The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Regulatory action should be based on accurate estimates of regulatory benefits and costs.
USDA withdraws an Obama-era rule that would have set animal welfare standards for organic foods.
Recent judicial decisions help clarify the legality of rule freezes after a change in administration.
Federal judge discusses the Trump Administration’s original travel ban.
Improving regulatory performance is vital for making Americans better off.
Policy oscillation creates serious problems that may require government scrutiny.
Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.
The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.
Regulators need a new system for responding to evolving market forces.
Deregulatory executive orders require a new approach to analyzing regulatory impact.
Recent executive orders undermine the longstanding belief in benefit-cost analysis.