Improving regulatory performance is vital for making Americans better off.
Policy oscillation creates serious problems that may require government scrutiny.
Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.
The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.
Regulators need a new system for responding to evolving market forces.
Deregulatory executive orders require a new approach to analyzing regulatory impact.
Recent executive orders undermine the longstanding belief in benefit-cost analysis.
The Trump Administration’s regulatory budget constraint may help improve agency benefit-cost analyses.
Scholars and industry representatives highlight takeaways from conference on new regulatory developments.
Despite speculation about his intent to fire the special counsel, President Trump is not above the law.
Firing Mueller would be extreme, but the next step would be even more perilous for the President.
The Solicitor General would readily comply with an order from President Trump to oust special counsel Mueller.