The Supreme Court again decries one form of discrimination while upholding another.
Analysts offer insights about the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of the past term.
Scholar contends that the emergence of “integrative enforcement” shows a shifting locus of immigration policy.
The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Regulatory action should be based on accurate estimates of regulatory benefits and costs.
USDA withdraws an Obama-era rule that would have set animal welfare standards for organic foods.
Recent judicial decisions help clarify the legality of rule freezes after a change in administration.
Federal judge discusses the Trump Administration’s original travel ban.
Improving regulatory performance is vital for making Americans better off.
Policy oscillation creates serious problems that may require government scrutiny.
Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.
The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.