Process

President Trump’s “one-in, two-out” mandate is irrational and violates the Constitution.

Legal scholar argues that the oft-criticized formal rulemaking process has virtues in proper settings.

Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.

Regulatory reform bill’s requirement of oral evidentiary hearings for rulemakings may prove to be ineffective.

Licensing changes such as the Uniform Bar Examination may quietly tilt the status quo in the legal field.

Oral argument transcripts may reveal Supreme Court Justices’ motivations for speaking.

Kansas moves to take control over workplace safety regulations.

Court finds that election regulator failed to properly consider a rule on debate participation.

New Philadelphia policies demonstrate the challenges of local regulation.

The Regulatory Review’s editor-in-chief reflects on the publication’s past year of coverage, against the backdrop of a fast-changing regulatory world.

This publication’s new name and newly designed website constitute a significant step forward, in furtherance of its mission of public service.

The Trump Administration’s embrace of a seldom-used law may undermine future regulatory efforts.