Scholar argues that overruling deference to agencies will constrain U.S. government action.
Republican states with major democratic metropolitan centers forestall local efforts to reform election law.
Scholars argue that federal administrative law judges need more insulation from political pressures.
Although “Medicare for all” has picked up political traction, how it will materialize remains unclear.
Experts offer solutions to pressing issues in American health care.
Challenges to redistricting are unlikely to be successful after recent Supreme Court decisions.
Does Congress delegate its authority to gain credibility with the public?
Eliminating the primary and caucus rules would create a more productive and responsive democracy.
Recent Supreme Court redistricting decisions clarify two important legal developments—but leave the status of partisan gerrymandering claims unresolved.
Rent-seeking and profit-seeking behavior provide valuable insights into the concept of regulatory capture.
Legal scholar examines how modern political parties help presidents oversee federal agencies.
Penn Program on Regulation workshop focuses on key factors shaping regulatory agendas.