The Supreme Court appears inconsistently enthusiastic about federal regulation and state-centric environmentalism.
Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.
Recent U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments provide hope for the future of Clean Water Act enforcement.
The Administration’s goal of “streamlining” infrastructure review is fundamentally misguided.
Despite state and local action, more effective reduction of single-use plastics must come from Congress.
As global temperatures rise, Americans will continue to pay the economic costs of climate change.
Expert explores how a Florida law insulates firing ranges from state and local environmental actions.
Expert argues that suits under California’s environmental law undercut housing and climate change goals.
Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.
States and subnationals can rise to the challenges posed by climate change.
Subnational regulators face a number of significant challenges as they seek to regulate climate change.
Ideological polarization and regulatory capture have made 2017 a bad year for EPA.