The Trump Administration’s new social cost of carbon policy muddies the waters.
Agency sees increased effectiveness after incorporating feedback from courts and academics.
Creative policy changes could re-center our criminal justice system.
Under President Trump’s executive order, the benefits of new regulations will play no role in regulatory decision-making.
Economist argues that energy-efficiency regulations are riddled with problems and espouses their elimination.
Scholar argues that regulators will have difficulty applying cost-benefit analysis to mandatory GMO labeling.
Public Citizen and the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards convened panels of regulatory experts.
Experts argue that the number and cost of regulations sharply rose in 2015—at a rate that has held steady in 2016.
What is the cost of emitting soot into the atmosphere? The answer is unclear, yet it plays an important role in policymaking.
Experts argue that Donald Trump’s focus on jobs and worker impacts instead of the application of the net social benefits test is imprudent.
Cost-benefit analysis is the most preferable form of analysis, and it should continue to be employed for important regulatory decisions.
Recent Court decisions have not created a presumption in favor of formal cost-benefit analysis.