New carbon rule is entirely at odds with Trump Administration’s earlier rhetoric on the Clean Power Plan.
Scholars argue that state policymaking cannot effectively counteract federal environmental deregulation.
Scholars argue that the use of visual media in federal rulemaking promotes democratic values.
EPA’s proposed transparency rules would make the agency’s analyses more scientifically rigorous.
President Obama’s Clean Power Plan prompted companies to expand transparency about their carbon emissions.
Former EPA Administrator urges the public to take action against climate change.
A one-size-fits-all approach to cost-benefit analysis won’t necessarily ensure better policy.
Recent proposed rule can be better understood by considering the fate of the Clean Power Plan in the Supreme Court.
Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.
A New Deal-era proposal would produce more effective, less burdensome regulation.
The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.
State and local regulators will face challenges in trying to pick up the slack after a federal withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.