APA

The Trump Administration will struggle to convince courts to uphold the repeal of many agency rules.

ACUS recommends inviting public participation in rulemaking even when agencies forgo notice and comment.

Executive orders to repeal rules and redefine “showerhead” contain a jarring assertion of presidential authority.

Myriad questions surround the role of Congress and the Supreme Court in checking presidential power.

The presidential influence chronicled in Graham’s magisterial book now threatens technocratic decision-making.

Repeal of EPA’s endangerment finding on greenhouse gases faces hurdles and would threaten regulatory instability.

The end of deference to agency statutory interpretations will result in regulatory inconsistency.

HHS’s reversal of its Nixon-era policy will reduce valuable public participation in rulemakings.

Recent actions by HHS undermine the promises of transparency made by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

ACUS’s recommendation on judicial review of federal regulations provides much-needed clarity.

Congress should use notice-and-comment rulemaking as a model for public input in the legislative process.

Efforts to modernize the APA should be approached with caution.