The Usefulness—and Possible Dangers—of Machine Learning
University of Pennsylvania workshop addresses potential biases in the predictive technique.
Optimizing Government
The Optimizing Government Project brings together scholars and researchers to discuss the use of machine learning by government.
Concluding Thoughts on Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Public’s Impact in Rulemaking
The Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA illustrates that the public has a serious role to play in the rulemaking process.
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Reasoned Agency Decision-Making
Scalia recounts his role in challenging a SEC rule on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The Public’s Role in Administrative Law
Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.
President Trump’s Regulatory Agenda
PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.
The CFPB’s Final Arbitration Rule Run Amok
New rule will raise costs, harming businesses, consumers, and the court system.
Should We Run Agencies More Like Businesses?
Legal scholar argues for greater reliance on entrepreneurial strategies in regulation.
The Case for Regulating After Harms Occur
Scholar argues that society is best off when regulators punish violations after the fact.
The Regulatory Accountability Act and the Obsolescence of Formal Rulemaking
Administrative agencies should not be required to use a process that has been obsolete for decades.
The FTC and Net Neutrality’s Plan B
Would the FTC be an effective body for regulating Internet openness?