Featured

Scientific research generated by civil settlements could help drive future EPA regulation.

The Court’s unprecedented decision applying the Takings Clause to regulatory access will have limited impact.

Scholar claims that regulatory sandboxes such as emergency use authorizations boost innovation, but at a cost.

Collins v. Yellen further clarifies the scope of “for cause” removal of agency heads.

Antitrust experts from the University of Pennsylvania reflect on the possible consequences of the recent Biden executive order on competition.

New York lawmakers’ attempt to regulate guns will result in significant legal challenges.

The repercussions of a recent Supreme Court decision could affect future trade regulations.

The Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Arthrex expands the avenues for politicizing agency adjudication.

FDA warns consumers to protect themselves from a known carcinogen in hair smoothing products.

CIC Services avoided anti-administrative rhetoric while securing the check of judicial review on the IRS.

Scholars argue religious liberty laws should stop the federal government from destroying Native sacred sites.

With its Prometheus decision, the U.S. Supreme Court centered agency deference in reasonableness.