FDA approves a pill that tracks when patients take their medication, CFPB director will resign, and more…
The Optimizing Government Project brings together scholars and researchers to discuss the use of machine learning by government.
House bill on autonomous vehicles restricts state policies that could improve safety.
The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.
Countries like Australia and Canada offer models for reining in delegation of lawmaking authority to agencies.
Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.
New National Academies of Sciences report offers much-needed clarity about regulatory design decisions.
Scholars, activists, and other criminal justice experts address possible legal responses to excessive police force.
PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.
Consumer safety leaders debate how independent agencies can best improve the rulemaking process.
Legal scholars and practitioners analyze the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.
Previously published essay on The Regulatory Review sparks debate over the role that cost-benefit analysis should play in regulatory decision-making.