Scholars debate the current and future regulatory landscape for workers.
Workers today face a rapidly evolving workplace. The gig economy has shaken up expectations about what being an employee or independent contractor means. Unionization rates continue to decline, but organizers have looked for alternative ways to engage workers. Recent U.S. Supreme Court cases have primarily upheld arbitration agreements covering workers, with a few exceptions.
Federal and state regulators have struggled to keep up with these trends, resulting in a wide variety of workplace laws around the country. Some states have raised the minimum wage and given workers paid family leave, while others have enacted right-to-work laws.
This series of essays addresses some of the many changes facing workers. Experts in labor and employment regulation focus on critical questions for the future: Who should be considered an employee or an independent contractor? How will automation affect workers? Should states or the federal government act to regulate employers?
The contributors to this series are: Sean Burke, an associate general counsel at the University of Pennsylvania; Deepa Das Acevedo, a professor at the Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr. School of Law at the University of Alabama; Cynthia Estlund, a professor at the New York University School of Law; Najah A. Farley, an attorney at the National Employment Law Project; Gregory F. Jacob, a partner at O’Melveny & Myers LLP; Alexander Kondo, an attorney at the U.S. Department of Labor; Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr., vice president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation; Moshe Z. Marvit, a fellow at The Century Foundation; Abraham Singer, an assistant professor at the Quinlan School of Business at Loyola University Chicago; and David Weil, dean of the Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University.
April 1, 2019 | David Weil, Brandeis University
Advocates for instituting progressive economic policies face an uphill battle, particularly in an age of wide and growing inequality. Yet the ratcheting dynamic between state and federal law provides an important caveat to pessimism about the inexorable forces of political economy and can help guide a progressive approach to improving workplace conditions.
April 2, 2019 | Moshe Z. Marvit, The Century Foundation
One of the biggest issues in labor law over the past few years has involved a deceptively simple and fundamental concept: the definition of an employer. The question of when a putative employer is categorized as a joint employer can make all the difference and will now likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
April 3, 2019 | Alexander Kondo, U.S. Department of Labor, and Abraham Singer, Loyola University Chicago
Better concepts are needed to talk about gig economy workers and other laborers who are subject to the arbitrary domination of powerful companies but who do not fit neatly into traditional understandings of employees. We suggest a new approach for characterizing this kind of work, which we call “labor without employment.”
April 4, 2019 | Najah A. Farley, National Employment Law Project
Non-compete agreements diminish a worker’s power to change jobs and bargain for higher wages by stopping workers from moving between jobs. This phenomenon is especially prevalent in low-wage and minimum-wage industries, but change is on the horizon at the state level.
April 5, 2019 | Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr., National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
Some federal and state labor laws in this country have long authorized requirements that workers pay union dues as a condition of employment. Increasingly, however, legislatures and courts are recognizing that workers have a constitutional right to work without being forced to subsidize a union.
April 8, 2019 | Cynthia Estlund, New York University
The rise of both fissuring and automation imperils the stability of employment as a platform for delivering a range of basic social entitlements, and points toward shifting the locus of some of those entitlements, as well as their costs, off employment and onto a broader and more redistributive revenue base.
April 9, 2019 | Deepa Das Acevedo, University of Alabama
The gig economy continues to confound courts and workers alike, but most of the characteristics of gig work that are supposed to make it unique, and therefore a bad fit for current employment laws, have easy, and easily regulated, analogies.
April 10, 2019 | Gregory F. Jacob, O’Melveny & Myers LLP
It remains unclear who the Labor Department considers to be an investment advice fiduciary following a court decision to vacate the Fiduciary Rule. The fact that the regulated community is left to speculate a full year after the decision, however, raises questions about the status of the rule and whether the Department must repeal it through rulemaking?
April 11, 2019 | Sean Burke, University of Pennsylvania
Can one person work as an employee and independent contractor at the same time? In many jurisdictions today they can. These conflicting outcomes plainly makes no sense, either as a matter of logic or for the sake of justice and efficiency.