New National Academies of Sciences report offers much-needed clarity about regulatory design decisions.
Scholar argues that regulators should try to impose penalties before rule violations can hurt society.
Scholar argues that bed quotas financially burden taxpayers and may violate the law.
The Trump Administration’s embrace of a seldom-used law may undermine future regulatory efforts.
Bill aimed at regulatory reform would reintroduce burdensome administrative requirements.
Independent agencies should adopt four key analytical standards.
OMB proposal to revise its racial and ethnic categories may better reflect America’s changing demographics.
Scholars argue that environmental laws improve air quality despite increases in U.S. manufacturing output.
Cost-benefit analysis is the most preferable form of analysis, and it should continue to be employed for important regulatory decisions.
Regulatory capture, neither inevitable nor a death trap for agencies, must be reduced to advance public policy goals.
In commemoration of RegBlog’s fifth anniversary, experts looks back on the last five years of regulation before looking forward to the next.
Scholar examines how high- and low-productivity in Congress shapes regulators’ ability to implement statutes.