The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.
State and local regulators will face challenges in trying to pick up the slack after a federal withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.
PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.
Study shows that carbon-trading programs may produce less revenue in concentrated markets.
Legal scholar argues for greater reliance on entrepreneurial strategies in regulation.
EPA provides advice instead of regulation in the new nanny state.
Researchers argue for new regulatory treatment of wildfires to improve air quality and public health.
Independent agencies should mirror executive branch practices to overcome judicial scrutiny.
Expanding a White House office could help shrink the whole federal government.
President Trump’s regulatory budget executive order withholds agency action and harms the American public.
Law does not address claims of excessive delegation of Congress’s policymaking responsibilities.
Scholars recommend incorporating health-based standards into federal drinking water regulations.