EPA

EPA’s lopsided focus on regulatory costs ignores the much larger forgone benefits and the law.

Lisa Heinzerling discusses recent developments in environmental law and regulation.

EPA’s decision to retreat from regulating greenhouse gas emissions runs contrary to law.

The federal government is moving backwards in its regulatory analysis and decision-making.

The Trump Administration is underweighting the value of human health in benefit-cost analysis.

EPA’s new rule fails to reform the agency’s methods for calculating benefits when regulating particulate matter.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to decline to monetize effects from air pollution prompts reactions by regulatory experts.

OSHA’s outdated standards endanger American workers by failing to limit ethylene oxide exposure.

Scholars argue that regulators have failed to protect child health under pesticide control law.

Scholars analyze how the use of machine learning could reshape EPA drinking water standards.

ACUS recommends best practices for federal agency consultation with tribal, state, and local governments.

A proposed rule seeks to reverse recent changes to the procedures EPA uses to conduct risk assessments of toxic chemicals.