EPA

Marchand’s argument questions key regulatory processes and ignores the net benefits of regulation.

EPA exemplifies how agency rulemaking pushes the boundaries of lawful policymaking.

President Obama’s Clean Power Plan prompted companies to expand transparency about their carbon emissions.

Limiting judicial deference to agencies would strengthen environmental policy and democratic accountability.

Agencies should boost penalties for fatal rule violations to match the value of a statistical life.

Former EPA Administrator urges the public to take action against climate change.

Judge Kavanaugh’s views on Chevron may create more uncertainty than exists under the current doctrine.

A one-size-fits-all approach to cost-benefit analysis won’t necessarily ensure better policy.

Environmentalists should question any move by this Administration’s EPA to reform its cost-benefit analysis.

Requiring EPA cost-benefit analysis could ensure that regulations do more good than harm.

EPA’s advance notice raises fundamental questions about how the agency should weigh costs and benefits.

Experts debate EPA’s recent move to consider regulating its own cost-benefit analyses.