EPA

Two recent Supreme Court decisions identify in which court EPA decisions can be challenged.

EPA’s attempts to reinterpret the Clean Air Act are detrimental to fighting climate change.

A recent Supreme Court decision shifts responsibility for pollution prevention from polluters to EPA.

Judicial review does not easily address problematic exercises of presidential influence in agency rulemaking.

Federal agencies under President Trump will harm public health by hiding information from the public.

Repeal of EPA’s endangerment finding on greenhouse gases faces hurdles and would threaten regulatory instability.

EPA has made significant progress on PFAS regulation over the past three years, but more work remains.

Scholar argues that civil penalties under environmental laws may survive Seventh Amendment challenges.

The Court stayed the “good neighbor” provision of the Clean Air Act in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency.

Five conditions have stunted EPA’s efforts to improve enforcement capabilities.

Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits.

Proposed greenhouse gas emission limits rely on a legal pathway preserved by last year’s Supreme Court decision.