The Supreme Court’s 2014-15 regulatory decisions affected environmental law, employment discrimination, and public safety.
RegBlog’s go to resources for understanding the newly released Clean Water Rule.
In letter to court, states claim that a tweet proves the EPA has made up its mind.
At oral arguments, Justices question whether EPA considered costs of regulation at the right time.
Considering the costs and benefits of regulation should include indirect effects in the calculation.
EPA’s consideration of costs in regulating toxic air pollutants should prove sufficient.
The Regulatory Review features commentaries on this term’s oral arguments in Michigan v. EPA.
Proposed legislation seeking to curb collusive deadline suits misunderstands the administrative process.
EPA and the EU differ over how to respect confidential business information while enforcing environmental regulation.