China’s approach to regulatory law has both helped and hindered the government’s response to COVID-19.
Expanded executive power presents challenges to plans for constitutional and political reform.
In Brazil, a political crisis rages between federal and state governments as coronavirus cases keep rising.
Curbing executive overreach requires a clear definition of “emergency” and limits on powers used to respond to crises.
The pandemic appears tailor-made for Singapore’s managerial and interventionist style of governance.
The secret to Taiwan’s successful fight against COVID-19 is its people, not its government.
Despite federal attempts to fight COVID-19, Japanese law prioritizes individual rights and regional autonomy.
The United States might well have saved many lives by following New Zealand’s science-based playbook.
Italy’s pandemic policies struggle with the same legislative and regulatory challenges as traditional laws.
The Federal Reserve should order banks to preserve capital by retaining earnings and halting all shareholder payouts.
Decades-long efforts in Vietnam to improve local governance have kept recorded coronavirus cases low.
Colombia lacks procedures for ensuring coordination among different levels of government.