Clean Air Act

Experts debate EPA’s recent move to consider regulating its own cost-benefit analyses.

The Clean Air Act’s success reveals the flaws in the standard critique of the administrative state.

Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.

EPA provides advice instead of regulation in the new nanny state.

Researchers argue for new regulatory treatment of wildfires to improve air quality and public health.

Study advocates for cumulative risk assessment mandates in environmental laws.

Scholars recommend incorporating health-based standards into federal drinking water regulations.

Scholars argue EPA may already have the tools it needs to effectively regulate greenhouse gases.

Initial signs suggest that drastic environmental deregulation looms, but there may be much less than the Administration envisions.

Scholars argue that environmental laws improve air quality despite increases in U.S. manufacturing output.

After a long battle, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule receives an update.

Environmental experts argue that precedent supports contested features of EPA’s major climate change rule.