Clean Air Act

Regulatory reform should reduce rulemaking burdens to promote effective agency action.

EPA’s proposed transparency rules would make the agency’s analyses more scientifically rigorous.

EPA exemplifies how agency rulemaking pushes the boundaries of lawful policymaking.

President Obama’s Clean Power Plan prompted companies to expand transparency about their carbon emissions.

Limiting judicial deference to agencies would strengthen environmental policy and democratic accountability.

Former EPA Administrator urges the public to take action against climate change.

Judge Kavanaugh’s views on Chevron may create more uncertainty than exists under the current doctrine.

Environmentalists should question any move by this Administration’s EPA to reform its cost-benefit analysis.

Experts debate EPA’s recent move to consider regulating its own cost-benefit analyses.

The Clean Air Act’s success reveals the flaws in the standard critique of the administrative state.

Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.

EPA provides advice instead of regulation in the new nanny state.