Clean Air Act

The late justice’s opinion in Chevron v. NRDC has greatly shaped judicial reasoning about administrative law.

Scholars argue that as EPA deregulates, nuisance suits could replace traditional environmental regulation.

Scholars explore whether the benefits of the Clean Water Act justify its costs.

Scholar argues that federal air laws conceal highly polluted areas.

Regulatory reform should reduce rulemaking burdens to promote effective agency action.

EPA’s proposed transparency rules would make the agency’s analyses more scientifically rigorous.

EPA exemplifies how agency rulemaking pushes the boundaries of lawful policymaking.

President Obama’s Clean Power Plan prompted companies to expand transparency about their carbon emissions.

Limiting judicial deference to agencies would strengthen environmental policy and democratic accountability.

Former EPA Administrator urges the public to take action against climate change.

Judge Kavanaugh’s views on Chevron may create more uncertainty than exists under the current doctrine.

Environmentalists should question any move by this Administration’s EPA to reform its cost-benefit analysis.