Clean Air Act

Judicial review does not easily address problematic exercises of presidential influence in agency rulemaking.

The Court stayed the “good neighbor” provision of the Clean Air Act in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency.

Scholar argues that environmental law and policy should expand its scope to inside areas.

Scholars analyze decreasing environmental prosecutions and propose enforcement improvements.

Proposed greenhouse gas emission limits rely on a legal pathway preserved by last year’s Supreme Court decision.

Scholars address regulatory struggles to rein in greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.

Scholar argues that technical assistance grants can spur meaningful involvement in permit decisions.

The Supreme Court casts a shadow across the regulatory state in opinion limiting EPA’s ability to fight climate change.

In a recent case, the Supreme Court failed to address the purpose of exemptions from EPA’s renewable fuel standard.

The Trump Administration has degraded environmental enforcement, favoring polluters over citizens’ interests.

A recent dispute illustrates how policymakers often miss crucial insights about structuring government.

Legal scholar argues for a new strategy to challenge animal farm pollution.