Scholar argues that recent Supreme Court decisions create a new vision of agency accountability to the public.
Scholars explain how courts have interpreted the Administrative Procedure Act to overlook racial discrimination.
Scholar brings the focus of administrative law to the level of municipal government.
Courts should not rely on the number of public comments to assess the legality of regulations.
Agencies can do more to disclose input on regulatory alternatives during notice-and-comment processes.
ACUS issues new recommendations to enhance administrative governance.
Despite its flaws and limitations, Stigler’s seminal article on the theory of economic regulation offers important lessons.
The Court’s unprecedented decision applying the Takings Clause to regulatory access will have limited impact.
Collins v. Yellen further clarifies the scope of “for cause” removal of agency heads.
The Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Arthrex expands the avenues for politicizing agency adjudication.
CIC Services avoided anti-administrative rhetoric while securing the check of judicial review on the IRS.
With its Prometheus decision, the U.S. Supreme Court centered agency deference in reasonableness.