Scholar argues that the Trump Administration has discredited cost-benefit analysis.
The late justice’s opinion in Chevron v. NRDC has greatly shaped judicial reasoning about administrative law.
In Merck v. Albrecht, the issue of federal preemption has crossed over the typical conservative and liberal divide.
The Supreme Court’s recent Weyerhaeuser decision will add to the administrative costs of protecting endangered species.
A recent Supreme Court decision could reshape judicial deference of agency actions.
The intelligible principle standard lives to see another day—but for how long remains unclear.
Commentators highlight the ramifications of the Court’s most significant regulatory cases.
Risk-based regulation requires regulators to choose which decision-making principles to apply.
The latest Economic Report of the President highlights the importance of studying cumulative regulatory costs.
Research fellow argues that a recent OMB memo could improve regulatory lawmaking.
Agencies should work to expand public engagement efforts beyond notice and comment.
ACUS’s recommendation on recusal could improve federal agency adjudication.