Scholars argue that federal advisory committees help align agency decision-making with electoral politics.
The Regulatory Review revisits its series published over the past year.
The Regulatory Review highlights the top regulatory stories written by our staff in 2020.
The Regulatory Review highlights the top essays written by our contributors in 2020.
The Regulatory Review presents its leading essays from the past year.
How should actors within the administrative state grapple with the questions Black Lives Matter poses?
Creating an anti-racist administrative state requires confronting and dismantling historic, systemic racism.
Leading scholars address the ways in which racism pervades the modern administrative state and legal profession.
Distinguished lecturer discusses restoring public support for regulation and how regulatory benefits are hidden in plain sight.
Beyond his many contributions to the law, Judge Williams’s intellectual curiosity fostered his commitment to humanity.
President Trump’s reactions to Supreme Court decisions threaten the legitimacy of the nation’s judicial system.
The Supreme Court relied on misleading arguments and revisionist history to strike down the CFPB’s structure.