How should actors within the administrative state grapple with the questions Black Lives Matter poses?
Creating an anti-racist administrative state requires confronting and dismantling historic, systemic racism.
Leading scholars address the ways in which racism pervades the modern administrative state and legal profession.
Distinguished lecturer discusses restoring public support for regulation and how regulatory benefits are hidden in plain sight.
Beyond his many contributions to the law, Judge Williams’s intellectual curiosity fostered his commitment to humanity.
President Trump’s reactions to Supreme Court decisions threaten the legitimacy of the nation’s judicial system.
The Supreme Court relied on misleading arguments and revisionist history to strike down the CFPB’s structure.
Requiring government institutions to engage in reasoned decision-making mitigates actions made in bad faith.
The Supreme Court appears inconsistently enthusiastic about federal regulation and state-centric environmentalism.
A recent case protecting LGBTQ rights may help the Supreme Court circumscribe the administrative state.
The Supreme Court has destabilized principles on federal agencies’ structures and for-cause removal.
An uncertain future awaits the federal program designed to benefit children of immigrants.