Process

The Supreme Court has raised new questions by rejecting historic understandings of agency authority.

A key Supreme Court decision limits presidential tariff power and reinforces why legal discipline matters for international trade.

In weakening checks on executive power, the Roberts Court overlooks the wisdom of its predecessors.

In Trump v. Barbara, the Justices’ arguments underscore their competing interpretive approaches.

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s tariffs, but it left the big issue of abusive presidential power unaddressed.

Trump v. Slaughter may force independent agencies to provide more rigorous justifications for new rules.

Scholars examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

A proactive framework for analyzing regulations can help municipalities regulate without Chevron deference.

Training records document compliance, but they may not reflect how organizations perform in practice.

Leslie Lewis Johnson discusses public engagement in Pennsylvania’s regulatory review process.

Scholars consider the potential impacts of visa reforms on labor markets and innovation.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to consider governmental interests could lead to a sweeping rollback of regulations.