Primary

Scholars recommend policies to address the harms of excessive noise.

Rejecting federal agencies’ interpretation of the Clean Water Act, the Supreme Court limits the application of federal law over wetlands.

The Supreme Court confirms an alternative avenue for disabled students to enforce their rights to receive an equitable education.

The Supreme Court narrowly rejects a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to a California pork law.

Merck misconstrues patent law in its recent Takings Clause challenge to Medicare’s price negotiation program.

The Supreme Court affirms social media companies’ business models, dodging for now the issue of liability for harmful speech.

Legal scholars discuss the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of the last term.

Scholars address regulatory struggles to rein in greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.

Scholars advocate mandated patient access to health device data.

Scholars claim that unregulated wilderness therapy programs fail to protect the children participants.

Scholars propose enabling patients to sue the makers and providers of discriminatory health care algorithms.

Scholar recommends implementing ESG standards to fight climate change and avoid criminal charges.