The Trump Administration’s claims about its deregulatory accomplishments do not withstand scrutiny.
Presidential administrations have taken dramatically different approaches to regulation over the last ten years.
Requiring government institutions to engage in reasoned decision-making mitigates actions made in bad faith.
An uncertain future awaits the federal program designed to benefit children of immigrants.
President Donald J. Trump’s response to police violence and peaceful protests undermines governmental legitimacy.
The Administration has taken an aggressive approach in using legal tools to advance its regulatory agenda.
Poor organizational choices have hampered the government’s management of COVID-19.
The Trump Administration’s 1-in-2-out policy is more of an ineffective symbol than an action toward deregulation.
EPA’s proposed relaxation of a rule restricting water pollution from coal plants generates controversy.
The Bureau of Land Management’s relocation sets the stage for other federal agencies to leave Washington.
The Administration quietly released data showing its deregulatory success has been limited.
Scholar argues that Trump’s steel tariffs and the responses from other countries endanger the free trade system.