The recent nullification of environmental regulations by a federal court sets a dangerous precedent.
Scholar argues that overruling deference to agencies will constrain U.S. government action.
Scholar argues that recent Supreme Court decisions create a new vision of agency accountability to the public.
Courts should not rely on the number of public comments to assess the legality of regulations.
A controversial approval of an Alzheimer’s treatment reveals a core weakness in oversight of agency discretion.
Deregulatory attacks have twisted a legal concept meant only to restrain extraordinary actions.
The Israeli judiciary exerts oversight and influence over the executive’s COVID-19 response.
American doctrines of judicial review may provide useful models for Brazilian courts.