Administrative law principles led the Supreme Court to deliver a victorious but unsatisfying and uncertain conclusion for migrants.
An uncertain future awaits the federal program designed to benefit children of immigrants.
Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.
DHS proposes implementing asylum application fees and extending applicants’ pre-employment waiting period.
Recent Trump Administration immigration policy survives round one in the courts.
In less than two years, the former Attorney General spearheaded significant changes to the U.S. immigration system.
Scholar examines the former Attorney General’s increased political oversight of immigration courts.
The Trump Administration violated administrative procedure to overhaul asylum policy.
Scholar contends that the emergence of “integrative enforcement” shows a shifting locus of immigration policy.
The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Federal judge discusses the Trump Administration’s original travel ban.
Despite its popularity, “evidence-based” policymaking is often less rational than it sounds.