Scholar examines the former Attorney General’s increased political oversight of immigration courts.
The Trump Administration violated administrative procedure to overhaul asylum policy.
Scholar contends that the emergence of “integrative enforcement” shows a shifting locus of immigration policy.
The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Federal judge discusses the Trump Administration’s original travel ban.
Despite its popularity, “evidence-based” policymaking is often less rational than it sounds.
The Trump Administration has significantly increased regulation of immigration—to the nation’s detriment.
Federal courts’ blocking of President Trump’s travel bans reaffirms the strength of the American system.
Scholar argues against using agency interpretations of immigration law in criminal deportation cases.
Economic, environmental, and policy considerations underlie the President’s “solar wall” proposal.
Scholar argues that bed quotas financially burden taxpayers and may violate the law.
Following the fallout over a massive email leak, the Democratic Party sought to unite on the Convention’s opening night.