Immigration Policy

The Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions allow racial animus to motivate policy choices.

Leading scholars address the ways in which racism pervades the modern administrative state and legal profession.

Administrative law principles led the Supreme Court to deliver a victorious but unsatisfying and uncertain conclusion for migrants.

An uncertain future awaits the federal program designed to benefit children of immigrants.

Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.

DHS proposes implementing asylum application fees and extending applicants’ pre-employment waiting period.

Recent Trump Administration immigration policy survives round one in the courts.

In less than two years, the former Attorney General spearheaded significant changes to the U.S. immigration system.

Scholar examines the former Attorney General’s increased political oversight of immigration courts.

The Trump Administration violated administrative procedure to overhaul asylum policy.

Scholar contends that the emergence of “integrative enforcement” shows a shifting locus of immigration policy.

The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.