The Supreme Court undercut antidiscrimination law in a case where the key issues were stipulated by the parties, leaving lower courts little guidance in how to apply its ruling.
Legal scholars discuss the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of the last term.
Civil rights attorney argues that recent Supreme Court religious liberty cases jeopardize antidiscrimination laws.
Scholar argues that the First Amendment guarantees the right to abortion.
The SEC’s proposed rule on climate disclosures could run afoul of the First Amendment.
Far from being narrow, the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest LGBTQ+ decision may threaten government’s overall regulatory authority.
A private fairness doctrine could induce more accurate media by dismantling the political information bubble.
A religious freedom law invoked by conservative groups may also protect progressive causes.
A Supreme Court decision from last term allows states to subsidize student attendance at religious schools.
Scholar argues that banning mandatory bar associations would be a public boon.
Experts call for crisis pregnancy center regulation to combat free speech concerns and medical misinformation.
Scholars address whether houses of worship are essential amid state social distancing orders.