Executive Power

In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court has expanded executive power and elevated the President above the law.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision on presidential immunity threatens the survival of the American Republic.

Originalist arguments for rewriting administrative law are weaker than they seem.

Although much more work remains, the current Administration has made historic progress in advancing equity.

Scholars argue that rollback tools mean Presidents must act fast to implement lasting policy.

The filibuster has caused Congress to give up its constitutional power to oversee the administrative state.

Scholars discuss some of the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions.

The Supreme Court relied on misleading arguments and revisionist history to strike down the CFPB’s structure.

Requiring government institutions to engage in reasoned decision-making mitigates actions made in bad faith.

The Supreme Court has destabilized principles on federal agencies’ structures and for-cause removal.

Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.

Executive and legislative branches of Spain’s government wield debatable legal authority in times of crisis.