Analysts debate the possible future ramifications of the Trump Administration’s deregulatory efforts.
Unemployed Floridians could lose weeks’ worth of jobless benefits they would otherwise be due.
The Trump Administration’s 1-in-2-out policy is more of an ineffective symbol than an action toward deregulation.
The Administration’s goal of “streamlining” infrastructure review is fundamentally misguided.
In its novel effort to bring independent agency regulations under White House oversight, the Trump Administration may have found a lasting legacy.
Some of President Trump’s deregulatory actions are innovations, others build on his predecessors’ work.
The history of regulatory policy in the United States is rich, but its future remains unclear.
Over the last two years, OIRA has made many positive contributions to the administrative state.
Regulatory benefit-cost analysis should account for people’s welfare, not just empirical data.
The economic foundations of Executive Order 12,866 underscore its continued importance in regulatory review.
EPA exemplifies how agency rulemaking pushes the boundaries of lawful policymaking.
A one-size-fits-all approach to cost-benefit analysis won’t necessarily ensure better policy.