The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Scholars contend that the President may revoke monument designations made during previous administrations.
Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.
The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.
Regulators need a new system for responding to evolving market forces.
Deregulatory executive orders require a new approach to analyzing regulatory impact.
Recent executive orders undermine the longstanding belief in benefit-cost analysis.
The Trump Administration’s regulatory budget constraint may help improve agency benefit-cost analyses.
Scholars and industry representatives highlight takeaways from conference on new regulatory developments.
The Trump Administration’s regulatory rollback highlights the opportunities and obstacles that lie ahead.
Comparative study suggests deregulatory policy is stronger as a political symbol than an economic stimulus.
PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.