Regulatory benefit-cost analysis should account for people’s welfare, not just empirical data.
The economic foundations of Executive Order 12,866 underscore its continued importance in regulatory review.
EPA exemplifies how agency rulemaking pushes the boundaries of lawful policymaking.
A one-size-fits-all approach to cost-benefit analysis won’t necessarily ensure better policy.
EPA’s advance notice raises fundamental questions about how the agency should weigh costs and benefits.
Regulatory counting paints a distorted picture of the costs and benefits of regulatory action.
Reagan-era regulatory reform will help restrict rule rescissions under Executive Order 13,771.
The Clean Air Act’s success reveals the flaws in the standard critique of the administrative state.
The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Scholars contend that the President may revoke monument designations made during previous administrations.
Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.
The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.