President Trump’s regulatory budget executive order withholds agency action and harms the American public.
Research forecasts a substantial increase in economically significant rules that would outpace that of the past three presidents’ final months.
This closely watched case highlights larger lessons about the limits on executive power.
Curbing excessive economic rents might bolster productivity and address rising inequality.
Scholar responds to University of Pennsylvania’s executive discretion series by highlighting transparency concerns.
Adrian Vermeule’s closing remarks highlight the role of conventions in limiting the exercise of executive power.
Christopher Yoo argues in defense of the use of presidential signing statements.
Dan Walters argues that the Administrative Procedure Act provides the courts with the best framework for reviewing presidential inaction.
Cary Coglianese assesses doctrinal limits on distinctions between presidential oversight and decision-making.
Courts have used the take care clause in multiple, and sometimes conflicting, ways.
Patricia Bellia explores legality of deferred action program under the faithful execution clause.
Nicholas Bagley analyzes expanding executive power in the name of health care reform.