A Trojan Horse from the Court’s Conservatives?
Far from being narrow, the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest LGBTQ+ decision may threaten government’s overall regulatory authority.
“LGBTQ+ Need Not Apply”
In a ruling last week, the U.S. Supreme Court moved closer to allowing LGBTQ+ discrimination.
Rescinding the Muslim Ban Is Not Enough
Muslims and activists call on President Biden to protect Muslims against discriminatory federal practices.
Race Masked in Colorblind Administrative Procedures
The Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions allow racial animus to motivate policy choices.
The Past and Present of Racism in the Administrative State
Creating an anti-racist administrative state requires confronting and dismantling historic, systemic racism.
Small Businesses of Color Matter Too
Minority-owned businesses are vital to economic growth, but discriminatory lending hinders access to credit.
AFFH and the Challenge of Reparations in the Administrative State
Federal housing regulations reveal how the government has embedded racist policies in the administrative state.
Clarifying the Default for Anti-Discrimination Statutes
Policy-free textual analysis wins when interpreting causation standards in statutory text for employment actions.
Why the Equality Act Remains Important to LGBTQ Equality
A Supreme Court victory is the beginning, not the end, of the fight against anti-LGBTQ discrimination.
The Supreme Court’s 2019-2020 Regulatory Term
Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.
How Does Regulation Affect LGBTQ+ Individuals?
This Saturday Seminar explores how different types of regulation treat gender identity and sexual orientation.