The Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions allow racial animus to motivate policy choices.
Creating an anti-racist administrative state requires confronting and dismantling historic, systemic racism.
Minority-owned businesses are vital to economic growth, but discriminatory lending hinders access to credit.
Federal housing regulations reveal how the government has embedded racist policies in the administrative state.
Policy-free textual analysis wins when interpreting causation standards in statutory text for employment actions.
A Supreme Court victory is the beginning, not the end, of the fight against anti-LGBTQ discrimination.
Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.
This Saturday Seminar explores how different types of regulation treat gender identity and sexual orientation.
Scholars consider methods for regulating individualized prices based on personal data.
While skirting the First Amendment, the Court set a potentially far-reaching standard for finding bias.