Recent Trump Administration immigration policy survives round one in the courts.
Smaller local jurisdictions are adopting pro-immigration policies at an unprecedented rate.
Marchand’s argument questions key regulatory processes and ignores the net benefits of regulation.
Scholar contends that the emergence of “integrative enforcement” shows a shifting locus of immigration policy.
The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.
Federal judge discusses the Trump Administration’s original travel ban.
The Trump Administration’s measures to restrict immigration do not square with its push to deregulate.
President Trump brought uncertainty to military transgender recruitment in 2017.
State-sponsored cyber attacks may require revamping how the government helps companies fight back.
Scholar argues that bed quotas financially burden taxpayers and may violate the law.
A recent PPR seminar discussed changes in how our government analyzes terrorism risks.
This closely watched case highlights larger lessons about the limits on executive power.