Administrative Procedure

Penn Law students met with experts in Washington to discuss proposals for reforming the regulatory process.

Cost-benefit analysis has become a routinized part of policymaking. Probing what justifies this methodology helps us to see how it might be improved.

Responding to significant agency backlogs, a new report recommends class action-type procedures.

A reformer takes on a major city bureaucracy that has grown accustomed to informal lawmaking procedures.

Earlier and less burdensome regulatory impact analyses would lead to more transparent, better regulatory decisions.

The Supreme Court sheds light on the finality of Army Corps of Engineers’ jurisdictional determinations.

Learn about the history of regulatory capture, its effect on public policy, and remedies for addressing corruption.

According to experts on a recent panel, identifying, measuring, and tackling capture should be a top priority for government.

These two forms of regulatory capture require different solutions.

When a regulation’s benefits exceed its costs, simplicity and interdisciplinary processes are essential to reducing capture.

ACUS committee warns against requirement to raise issues in rulemaking before seeking judicial review.

Administrative Conference report recommends best practices for video conferencing by federal agencies.