Administrative Procedure

Scholars examine how a recent Supreme Court decision may reshape federal agency adjudication.

The high Court will confront climate change, judicial review, and other regulatory issues.

It is much too soon to give up on good-cause removal protections for administrative law judges.

Weakening agency independence could make agency adjudication unconstitutional without judicial review.

Designating OIRA early as the lead project manager would allow for a more effective rulemaking process.

Republicans are using the Government Accountability Office to expand the reach of the Congressional Review Act.

Louis Capozzi examines how state-level officials challenge and defend federal regulations.

Calling an unlawful transfer of statutory functions a “partnership” does not make it legal.

The Supreme Court upholds a high-stakes adjudication system, but important constitutional questions remain.

Scholars and practitioners from around the world explore regulatory simplification and how best to ease regulatory burdens.

James Sandman discusses the accessibility of legal representation in federal administrative proceedings.

Scholar argues that regulation should be thought of as a verb, because regulating well demands dynamic and ongoing effort.