Inside Agency Class Actions
Most agencies enjoy authority to aggregate cases and would benefit from doing so, but very few actually do.
Hill Briefing Addresses Regulatory Challenges for Next Administration
Public Citizen and the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards convened panels of regulatory experts.
Red Tape on the Upswing
Experts argue that the number and cost of regulations sharply rose in 2015—at a rate that has held steady in 2016.
Donald Trump, the “Workers’ Party” Candidate, on Regulation
Experts argue that Donald Trump’s focus on jobs and worker impacts instead of the application of the net social benefits test is imprudent.
Second Presidential Debate Sees Personal Attacks Interrupted by Occasional Policy
Important policy revelations emerged during Sunday night’s heated debate.
An Education in Regulatory Reform
Penn Law students met with experts in Washington to discuss proposals for reforming the regulatory process.
The Regional Reality of Federal Regulation
Penn Law students learn about adjudication and regional enforcement of regulations.
Hillary Clinton Rallies West Philadelphians to Register and Vote
The Democratic candidate for President shares her platform and voter mobilization goals.
In First Presidential Debate, Candidates Spar over Economy, Crime, Trade
Interspersed between jeers and jabs, substance takes center stage during widely anticipated event of the presidential race.
A Reply to Professor Amy Sinden’s Critique of the “Cost-Benefit State”
Cost-benefit analysis is the most preferable form of analysis, and it should continue to be employed for important regulatory decisions.
Supreme Court Remains Skeptical of the “Cost-Benefit State”
Recent Court decisions have not created a presumption in favor of formal cost-benefit analysis.
A Debate Over the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis
Previously published essay on The Regulatory Review sparks debate over the role that cost-benefit analysis should play in regulatory decision-making.