Process

Law professor argues that states play a critical, but often neglected, role in constitutional decision-making.

Scholars debate the merits and drawbacks of the recently proposed Regulatory Accountability Act, which would dramatically reform the rulemaking process.

Law does not address claims of excessive delegation of Congress’s policymaking responsibilities.

Rather than raising alarm bells, government uses of artificial intelligence fit well within existing legal frameworks.

Regulatory reform bill’s public hearing requirement will hinder agencies’ attempts to regulate.

Recent bill would provide much-needed change to the most prominent source of U.S. administrative law.

President Trump’s “one-in, two-out” mandate is irrational and violates the Constitution.

Legal scholar argues that the oft-criticized formal rulemaking process has virtues in proper settings.

Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.

Regulatory reform bill’s requirement of oral evidentiary hearings for rulemakings may prove to be ineffective.

Licensing changes such as the Uniform Bar Examination may quietly tilt the status quo in the legal field.

Oral argument transcripts may reveal Supreme Court Justices’ motivations for speaking.